<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon&#8217;s L Cannon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kitsunesuki.com/2008/08/09/canons-l-cannon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kitsunesuki.com/2008/08/09/canons-l-cannon/</link>
	<description>Resins, Figures, Rant, Anime and Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 11:36:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip (redmango)</title>
		<link>http://www.kitsunesuki.com/2008/08/09/canons-l-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-2575</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip (redmango)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitsunesuki.com/?p=220#comment-2575</guid>
		<description>I too have the Canon 24-105 f/4L. It&#039;s great on my EOS 5D...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have the Canon 24-105 f/4L. It&#8217;s great on my EOS 5D&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andra</title>
		<link>http://www.kitsunesuki.com/2008/08/09/canons-l-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-2481</link>
		<dc:creator>andra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 08:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitsunesuki.com/?p=220#comment-2481</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still surviving through the grass and tree barks days and can hardly save $$ for a SLR ;_;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still surviving through the grass and tree barks days and can hardly save $$ for a SLR ;_;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kippei</title>
		<link>http://www.kitsunesuki.com/2008/08/09/canons-l-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-2464</link>
		<dc:creator>Kippei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitsunesuki.com/?p=220#comment-2464</guid>
		<description>Largely is the IS and the 105mm that got me over. 24-70 is too big</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Largely is the IS and the 105mm that got me over. 24-70 is too big</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonic_ver2</title>
		<link>http://www.kitsunesuki.com/2008/08/09/canons-l-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-2463</link>
		<dc:creator>sonic_ver2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitsunesuki.com/?p=220#comment-2463</guid>
		<description>L lens in discount price is very great deal! But why choose 24-105 and not 24-70? It has larger aperture than 24-105.

Anyway, i heard that Tamron 28-75 F2.8 Aspherical (forgot the complete name) has better result than Canon 24-70L or 24-105L lenses, and it&#039;s waaaaaayyyy cheaper (around USD 1000 for Canon 24-70L or USD 300 for Tamron). Have you ever heard about this?

sonic_ver2s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sonicver2/~3/356964116/elwing-kotobukiya.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Elwing - Kotobukiya&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>L lens in discount price is very great deal! But why choose 24-105 and not 24-70? It has larger aperture than 24-105.</p>
<p>Anyway, i heard that Tamron 28-75 F2.8 Aspherical (forgot the complete name) has better result than Canon 24-70L or 24-105L lenses, and it&#8217;s waaaaaayyyy cheaper (around USD 1000 for Canon 24-70L or USD 300 for Tamron). Have you ever heard about this?</p>
<p>sonic_ver2s last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sonicver2/~3/356964116/elwing-kotobukiya.html" rel="nofollow">Elwing &#8211; Kotobukiya</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

